Supreme Court chuan Thawh\anni khan India ramah ‘constitutional religion’ pakhat chauh awm rawh se tia ngenna chu hnawlin peititioner chu miin an duh sakhua an biak leh zui theihna chu a dang thei em ni a ti zui.
Bench of justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul leh Sudhanshu Dhulia te chuan peitioner chu khawi a\angin nge hetiang ngaihdan hi a neih tiin an zawt bawk a.
“Constitutional religion pakhat chauh awm se i ti a. Miten an duh sakhua an zui theihna i dang thei em ni? Hei hei eng nge ni reng reng?” tiin Bench chuan amah inlan (Peitioners-in-person) chu a zawt a ni.
Petitioners-in-person hi mimal lawyer ni lo registrar in court a inlan phalna a pek an ni a. He petition hi Mukesh Kumar leh Mukesh Manveer Singh te thehluh a ni a.
“Hei hi eng nge ni? He petition hmang hian eng nge duh in neih?” tiin bench chuan zawhna a zawt zui a.
Petitioner chuan social activist a nih thu sawiin India mipui ‘one constitutional religion’ duhtute aiawhin Article 32 of the Constitution hnuaiah public interest litigation a thehlut a ni tiin a sawi a.
“Eng behchhanin nge i thehluh?” tiin court chuan a zawt zui a. Petitioner chuan constitutional order of 1950 chu nuaibo a duh tia sawiin mahse eng constitutional order ber nge a sawi fak chuang lo va. Court chuan a dilna chu a hnawlsak zui ta a ni.
Article 32 of the Constitution chuan India ram khua leh tui te chu an fundamental rights te bawhchhiata a awm a nih chuan Supreme Court-a an zualko theihna a siam a ni.
Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.
Prev Post